Chinese Inverter Backdoors: A Renewable Energy Cybersecurity Wake-Up Call
- Joseph Assaf Turner
- May 15
- 3 min read

Supply Chain Security in Energy: Assessing the “Ghost in the Machine” Risk
An in-depth analysis for executive leadership and board members on undisclosed communication devices in Chinese-manufactured inverters, and why immediate action is required to safeguard grid resilience.
Introduction & Disclaimer

Leading renewable energy operators worldwide are confronting a disturbing supply-chain vulnerability: undocumented communication modules found in Chinese-made solar inverters and batteries. First reported by Reuters on May 14, 2025, experts confirmed these hidden cellular radios are real, but as of this writing there is no confirmed case of exploitation, sabotage, or data exfiltration. All known risks remain theoretical, yet the mere existence of these backdoor pathways demands urgent executive attention (Reuters, May 14 2025).
1. Market Context & Strategic Dependencies
Global Inverter Market Share: Major Chinese suppliers e.g. Huawei, Sungrow, Ginlong Solis, account for over 70% of global solar inverter installations. Their products underpin everything from utility-scale farms to distributed residential systems.
Monoculture Risk: When a few vendors dominate, undisclosed hardware flaws have systemic impact. A single hidden component can introduce supply-chain Trojans at scale.
Traditional Security Assumptions: Utilities assume remote-management interfaces operate over well-documented VPN or SCADA channels protected by firewalls. Hidden radios break that model by creating separate, unmonitored links.
For boards and executives, these factors signal that renewable energy cybersecurity and supply chain security in energy must be top-level risk categories, not technical footnotes.
2. Discovery of Undocumented Communication Modules
Confirmed Findings: On May 14, 2025, Reuters reported that U.S. energy officials and third-party hardware analysts uncovered cellular radios and other comms modules directly soldered onto inverter and battery circuit boards, features absent from all publicly available specifications (Reuters, May 14 2025).
Undisclosed Scope: The exact number of affected units and precise models remain undisclosed. Leading utilities, including Florida Power & Light, have initiated asset inventories to determine exposure.
Regulatory Acknowledgment: The U.S. Department of Energy has publicly noted that inconsistent vendor disclosures hinder supply-chain transparency, placing energy hardware documentation behind industries such as telecommunications and semiconductors.
3. Documented Policy & Regulatory Responses
3.1 United States
Procurement Restrictions Draft legislation in Congress would bar federal agencies and contractors from acquiring Chinese-made inverters or batteries containing undisclosed communication hardware.
Disclosure Mandates Proposed rules call for a mandatory Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) and complete hardware component lists for all grid-connected devices.
3.2 Europe
Targeted Bans Estonia and Lithuania have enacted bans on remote-access ports in specified Chinese renewables equipment.
Audits Underway The U.K. Department for Energy Security is auditing imported inverters for hidden modules, with potential restrictions to follow.
3.3 Industry Initiatives
Utility-Led Teardowns: Several large utilities have contracted independent labs to perform physical teardown analyses, verifying or refuting the presence of undisclosed radios.
Vendor Engagement: Some suppliers have begun issuing enhanced component disclosures under confidentiality agreements with major customers.
These policy and industry actions demonstrate how rapidly supply chain security in energy is moving from theory to practice, but also highlight the need for proactive oversight at the executive level.
4. Verified Risks & Hypothetical Threat Scenarios
While no exploitation cases are confirmed, executives should treat the following scenarios as plausible - each illustrating why hardware trust is as vital as software integrity:
Bypass of Network Defenses: Hidden radios could communicate directly with external servers, circumventing firewalls and air-gapped OT segments.
Covert Remote Commands: A clandestine module might receive over-the-air commands (e.g., reset, firmware update) without passing through standard SCADA controls.
Supply-Chain Trojan Deployment: Embedded modules could serve as staging points for malware distribution or backdoor insertion at scale, affecting multiple facilities simultaneously.
5. Executive Best Practices
To address the confirmed risks and mitigate threats, boards and C-suites should endorse the following measures:
Comprehensive Hardware Audits
Consider teardown testing and firmware validation for all renewable-energy equipment.
Require vendor-supplied SBOMs and hardware declarations, with audit rights built into contracts.
Procurement Policy Overhaul
Update purchasing guidelines to exclude devices lacking full component transparency.
Align contracts with emerging federal restrictions and international standards.
Network Segmentation & Monitoring
Enforce strict air-gapping of critical OT networks.
Implement continuous monitoring for any unauthorized wireless communications.
Incident Response Readiness
Incorporate hardware-based threat drills (e.g., simulated backdoor activation).
Validate manual override and isolation procedures for field-deployed inverters.
Supplier Diversification & Onshoring
Cultivate multi-vendor ecosystems to avoid single-vendor dependencies.
Evaluate domestic or allied-country manufacturing partnerships to reduce strategic risk.
6. Next Steps
Hidden radios in Chinese-manufactured inverters expose a real supply-chain vulnerability that could undermine grid stability and corporate reputation. Maya Security specializes in operational-technology resilience assessments, uncovering undisclosed hardware risks before they become emergencies.
Contact us today to schedule a comprehensive OT resilience audit and secure your energy infrastructure against hidden backdoors.
Kommentarer